III) In the version in the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second Variation) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed into the petitioner and others was simple presence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon through the prosecution against the petitioner and his higher than mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is actually a delay of someday inside the registration of FIR which has not been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness in the alleged occurrence and also the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession on the petitioners has long been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened for being the real brothers on the deceased but they didn't react in the slightest degree to your confessional statements in the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not look much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is not any explanation concerning why her arrest was not effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a lot of situations that extra judicial confession of an accused is really a weak check here type of evidence which can be manoeuvred through the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution is usually counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to existence of some light in the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners together on the motorcycle at four.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to offer substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
Previous four tax years interpreted. It is not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
This guide offers useful insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case legislation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
Online access for the case management system for that Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases could be searched using name or case number.
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station on account of likely health risks and dangers.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, would be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It involves the execution with the convicted person for a consequence of their crime.
Generally speaking, higher courts tend not to have direct oversight over the reduced courts of record, in that they cannot reach out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments from the decrease courts.
Try to find websites affiliated with trustworthy legal institutions or organizations. Validate the information against other sources when achievable.
competent authority has determined the eligibility in the private respondents and found them to generally be match for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)